ehofmann/ERP-samk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects 2 Releases Activity

adding video

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Eduardo Luis Hofmann
2022-10-31 00:12:30 +02:00
parent 6f9a995ef2
commit 1461429445
4 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
03Comparison.md
View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Axelor was selected for testing purpose and an instance has been installed in a
## Comparison methodology ## Comparison methodology
For the purpose of the [assigment 3.4](assigments/assigment3.md) For the purpose of the [assigment 3.4](assigments/assigment3.md)
> 4. Find at least two ERP suppliers', present their commercial module names and find similarities and differences between these two suppliers' modules. > 4. Find at least two ERP suppliers', present their commercial module names and find similarities and differences between these two suppliers' modules.
I will compare based on the user interface, matching similarities and differences. Assuming that Axelor is the reference ERP system. I will compare based on the user interface, matching similarities and differences. Between the implementation of [Axelor](https://erp.33co.de) and [OFBiz](https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/manufacturing/control/main).
## Side by Side ## Side by Side
### BOM Bill Of Materials ### BOM Bill Of Materials
@@ -33,5 +33,6 @@ This is a good example when a company decide to use or not use a module. I'm bee
A [Computerized maintenance management system](https://www.ibm.com/topics/what-is-a-cmms) or CMMS has much more features that really attend the objective of a maintenance team. Maintain equipment in perfect working conditions. This explain the reasons behind to not chose all the module offered by a single ERP supplier and implement different solutions to specific use case. A [Computerized maintenance management system](https://www.ibm.com/topics/what-is-a-cmms) or CMMS has much more features that really attend the objective of a maintenance team. Maintain equipment in perfect working conditions. This explain the reasons behind to not chose all the module offered by a single ERP supplier and implement different solutions to specific use case.
--- ---
[back Assignment 3](03Module.md)
[back HOME](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk) [back HOME](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk)

3
03Module.md
View File

@@ -51,10 +51,11 @@ Not vital modules, but the use of these modules will allow the company become mo
These selections are for a product oriented company, a service company would priorize more Sales and Stock Management. These selections are for a product oriented company, a service company would priorize more Sales and Stock Management.
This is the benefit of modules, a company can select the ones that fit the correct purpose of the business activity. This is the benefit of modules, a company can select the ones that fit the correct purpose of the business activity.
<br><br><br> <br><br><br>
<br>
## Interconnection ## Interconnection
As described in more details in the [Machines](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk/src/branch/master/03Comparison.md#machines) section on ERP comparison, a way to interconnect two different systems like an ERP with **Stock Management** and **Purchase** with a [CMMS](https://www.ibm.com/topics/what-is-a-cmms). Is for example a situation that the CMMS will consume the parts from the ERP inventory, when a preventive maintenance has been executed and the **Stock Management** module will trigger the purchase of replacement parts. As described in more details in the [Machines](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk/src/branch/master/03Comparison.md#machines) section on ERP comparison, a way to interconnect two different systems like an ERP with **Stock Management** and **Purchase** with a [CMMS](https://www.ibm.com/topics/what-is-a-cmms). Is for example a situation that the CMMS will consume the parts from the ERP inventory, when a preventive maintenance has been executed and the **Stock Management** module will trigger the purchase of replacement parts.
[Continue to Side by Side comparison](03Comparison.md)
[back HOME](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk) [back HOME](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk)

1
README.md
View File

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ More information on how to navigate through the platform, check this [video](vid
| Link | Description | | Link | Description |
|--|--| |--|--|
| [Update after task 3](videos/updateAfterTask03.mp4) | This video present the changes after complete Task 03, quick comparison of two ERP systems |
| [Update after task 2](videos/updateAfterTask02.mp4) | This video present the changes after complete Task 02 and the ERP for testing purpose | | [Update after task 2](videos/updateAfterTask02.mp4) | This video present the changes after complete Task 02 and the ERP for testing purpose |
|<a href="https://erp.33co.de" target="_blank">ERP Sandbox Implementation</a> | Sandbox ERP implementation using Axelor ERP **{user and password are on moodle}** | |<a href="https://erp.33co.de" target="_blank">ERP Sandbox Implementation</a> | Sandbox ERP implementation using Axelor ERP **{user and password are on moodle}** |
| [Project management](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk/projects/1) | Link to tasks and kanban board related to the project management | | [Project management](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk/projects/1) | Link to tasks and kanban board related to the project management |

BIN
videos/updateAfterTask03.mp4 Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.