adding video

04ERPArchiteture.md

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 # ERP Architeture
 
 Architecting  a software system is like building something with LEGO. There is an almost endless possibilities that will achieve the desired result. It really depends on what are the main actors predisposition to deal with the pros and cons of the selected solution.     
-I personally stand for owning and keeping everything under my or "the company" control. Even that this could result in more expesive operation. The reason for my personal choice is to not trust on continuous operation of suppliers, but not only to this extend. Lately the subscription model has become a standard in the digital market. This mean that the company or yourself don't own the software. From the moment that a decision has been made to stop paying the subscription. Not only the service will stop, but also the way to access historical data. Another issue is also related to **Terms of Service** agreement that change quite often.     
+
+I personally stand for owning and keeping everything under my or "the company" control. Even that this could result in more expensive operation. The reason for my personal choice is to not trust on continuous operation of suppliers, but not only to this extend. Lately the subscription model has become a standard in the digital market. This mean that the company or yourself don't own the software. From the moment that a decision has been made to stop paying the subscription. Not only the service will stop, but also the way to access historical data. Another issue is also related to **Terms of Service** agreement that change quite often.       
+
 However, is also understandable, that if a company don't have skills and knowledge, or even worst become dependent of a single employee to maintain the operation. Is better to move to cloud services or even a licensing model on which you get a quantity of users accounts and don't need to deal with any kind of technical activities.
 ## Axelor ERP
 At beginning of the course, around firsts days of October, I setup a Virtual Machine and installed the Axelor ERP for testing purpose. since that time, the system is working without need for intervention, except one general intervention to renew certificates for all the network devices, not related with the ERP Axelor, but with the infrastructure. 

05ChangeManagement.md

@@ -1 +1,3 @@
-# Change Management
+# Assigment 4
+## The end
+This [video](videos/assigment4.mp4) describe the final status of the project.

README.md

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ More information on how to navigate through the platform, check this [video](vid
 
 |  Link  | Description |
 |--|--|
+| [Update after task 4](videos/assigment4.mp4) | This video shortly describe final changes in the ERP portfolio for the assigment 4 |
 | [Update after task 3](videos/updateAfterTask03.mp4) | This video present the changes after complete Task 03, quick comparison of two ERP systems |
 | [Update after task 2](videos/updateAfterTask02.mp4) | This video present the changes after complete Task 02 and the ERP for testing purpose |
 |<a href="https://erp.33co.de" target="_blank">ERP Sandbox Implementation</a> | Sandbox ERP implementation using Axelor ERP **{user and password are on moodle}** |

assigments/assigment4.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+#4 Group/ individual work/ package deal
+Opened: Tuesday, 1 November 2022, 12:00 AM
+Due: Sunday, 27 November 2022, 11:59 PM
+Your work is almost done, congratulations! It’s time to return your final portfolio. How does your report look like? Do you have something in every project phase? Probably not? 
+
+1. Fill the gaps by adding short explanations what should be under the empty phases in this kind of project.
+
+2. Add photos, drawings, printscreens etc. if you think it increases the value of your work.
+
+3. Return your final portfolio by Moodle.
+
+If you are sharing a link to your portfolio, please make sure it is available also for users outside SAMK. Thank you.
+
+********
+
+Grading system
+
+5 excellent
+
+All points requested in the assignment instructions are carefully and well-structured answered. The schedule of report is respected and the report demonstrates ambitious attitude towards the subject, as well as a diverse and critical use of sources combined with students' own thinking. Portfolio and report are creative and easy to read.
+
+3-4 good, very good
+
+Almost all the points requested in the assignment instructions are clearly answered. The report is carefully constructed and shows elements of students’ own thinking. Students' thinking is clearly distinguishable from sources. Portfolio and report are easy to read and shows elements of creativity.
+
+1-2 passable, satisfactory
+
+The report is deficient and/or work-quantitatively clearly undersized, but there are shown some individual elements requested in the assignment instructions. Only the simplest sources are used and students' own thinking do not distinguish itself clearly. The report and portfolio follow the path of least resistance.
+
+0 fail
+
+Some/all assignments are missing from project portfolio. 
+
+[local copy from moddle assigment](https://moodle3x.samk.fi/mod/assign/view.php?id=563383&action=view)
+
+[back HOME](https://code.33co.de/ehofmann/ERP-samk)